February 2

Lab 4: Refined DNA Extraction 02/01/2018

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose:

The purpose of this lab was to show us students how protocols and procedures are generally formed in a laboratory setting. Also, this lab allowed for us students to become more familiar with creating an experimental control group and focus on editing a protocol.
Procedure 

  •  Brainstorm potential changes that could be made to the Ludox centrifugation protocol from last week
  •  Edit and recreate a refined Ludox protocol
  • Perform this new refined Ludox protocol

 Refined Ludox Protocol 

  1. Obtain 5g of soil (filtered) in a jar
  2. Add 7mL of water and mix for 5-10mins
  3.  Add 200 micrometers of 25% glutaraldehyde in conjunction with 1800 micrometers of the soil-water
  4. Mix this mixture for 2 min of total solution
  5. Vortex and mix the mixture well
  6. Inject 2mL of the sample mix into the Ludox using p1000 at the 6mL mark Add 2mL of food coloring dyed distilled water to the top of the Ludox solution
  7. Do not mix these two
  8. Centrifuge the tube at 4000 x gravity for 15minutes
  9. Remove 2mL of organic layer
  10. Count five 2microliter drops for cells and obtain the class average
  11. Centrifuge the 2microliter tube (or use two 1.5mL) tubes at 15000 x gravity for 1 minute with the mark facing the outside to be able to note the pellet side
  12. Remove 2000microliters of supernatant with a p1000 micropipette
  13. Leave a small amount of liquid in the tube (5-10 microliters) of supernatant
  14. Freeze the tube for DNA extraction

Control Group 

  • Obtain 5g of soil (sterilized)
  • Add 2mL of Tetrahymena culture (2000 cells)
  • Add 5mL of water
  • Repeat steps 3-10 from the refined protocol on then control sample

Observations 

With limited time remaining in our scheduled lab time, group 1 only got to complete the refined protocol up to step 6

Starting soil amount: 5.1g

Amount of Ludox: 8mL

Weight of Tube + Ludox + Sample + Water: 21.2

Conclusion    

The groups found this lab different due to the freedom we had. We basically created our own protocol for DNA extraction using the Ludox. Being able to discuss as a class a refined, standardized protocol for the Ludox allowed me to reflect more on the technology and process. Ultimately, this lab helped me to understand and comprehend more about the Ludox than I had last lab. My group, group 1, stored our sample in the yellow tube rack, labelled under ’21-1 TCA.’ Hopefully, one of us can come in during open lab and get a little bit farther in the refined Ludox protocol.

January 26

Lab 3: Ludox Gradient Centrifuge Protocol 1/25/2018

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose:

The purpose of lab eight was to complete the Ludox gradient centrifugation protocol that we were introduced to by Dr. Adair in the previous lab. She introduced to us all the steps, however this week we actually carried out the steps. This lab allowed us to see sides of the BSB that we had not previously seen before. After completely the protocol, we began to set up the experiment for next week. We prepared the cells for DNA extraction with the use of a microfuge at a force of 12000 x gravity. After it was completed, it left behind a pellet that will be examined next week.

Procedure

  • Add 8mL of Ludox HS 40 to a 15mL conical tube
  • Take 2mL of liquid from the soil sample provided and quickly inject it into the Luxox about 3 centimeters below the surface.
  • Add 2mL of distilled water with red food coloring to the top of the Ludox making sure not to mix the water and Ludox
  • Weigh your conical tube and make sure the masses are identical to the one it will be paired with in the group next to you
  • Label the conical tube
  • Locate a swinging bucket rotor and centrifuge the conical tube for about 15 minutes at a force of 4300 x gravity
  • Remove the tube and use a pipette to remove the visible cell layer
  • Place the removed cell layer solution into a clean microfuge tube
  • Remove 3 drops of around 3-10microliters and place them on a concavity slide
  • View each drop under the microscope at a magnification of 100x Record observations/count any ciliates
  • Label centrifuge tubes
  • Spin the cells in the microfuge at a force of 12,000 x gravity for one minute
  • Remove the liquid from the tube carefully  make sure to leave the pellet at the bottom
  • Place centrifuge tubes on the rack and put them away
  • Clean up your group’s work station

Data and Observations Data and Observations

Our group found 3 ciliates and 1 cyst throughout all 9 drops  The ciliates did not move while under observation due to alkaline Ludox solution  The Ludox from the drops had cracks in them as they dried up

Conclusion

After completing the Ludox gradient centrifugation protocol, the group was able to locate three ciliates and one cysts. It was extremely difficult to determine what was a ciliate and what was not a ciliate, because the ciliates were not moving to begin with. The process was not that time consuming, but it was also just one of the first steps in order to obtain the cell pellet for future study for DNA extraction. In the future we will be examine the cell bellet we obtained at the end of this lab from the microcentrigue.

January 19

Lab 2: Literature Review and Protocol Design

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose:

The purpose of lab 2 was to listen and takes notes over all eight groups’ presentation over their assigned literature. As each group presented, they described the main purpose, challenges, and some of the advantages of their article. We then designed our own protocol for metabarcoding of soil ciliates so they could potentially be used during the lab in this semester.
Procedure: 

  • Turn in presentation on Canvas
  • Present your article to the class
  • Take notes over the remaining group’s articles
  • Copy down all key notes and post on blog
  • Listen and take notes over Dr. Adair’s presentation about the Ludox gradient centrifugation
  • With your small group, design your own way to make a presentation  Turin in the created protocol

Data and Observations

Group 1: we learned about cluster construction and operational taxonomic units

Group 2- Review article

Challenges: researchers had to be alert of random chimeric sequences

Application:  numerous primers were research din this review article, we can use the results to determine which primers work best with ciliates and then experiment with multiple primers  we can use databases a such as BLAST and MUSCLE to further research the primers that have been reviewed because of this research, we know that certain primers are better for testing certain groups than others Why use Chimeric Sequence?  When doing the sequencing protocol, that are not real sequences. Chimeric sequence: part are form different organisms. You can tell by comparing sequences which ones are chimeric. They are artifacts.
Group 3- Primary article

Purpose: to detect zoonotic protists in raw sewage samples  microbes pose as threats to environmental and public health  similarities in DNA of the Avian microbial parasite to human microbes can indicate a possibility for the Avian microbial parasite to become zoonotic  seen that in the past from swine flu

Challenges: field of genetic extraction is relatively new  V4 and V9 have not been used to genetically distinguish very closely related species before this study Host DNA has the tendency to mask the microbial DNA

Application: The temperature at which the samples were stored at to best replicate the DNA extracted as 37C  developed specific and effeccient timing cycles of heating and cooling to promote DNA replication  Samples were grouped by extraction volume, primers used, and application region  V4 worked better in taxonomy accuracy when compared to V9
Group 4- Barcoding Ciliates (primary)

Purpose: demonstrate how mitochondria cox1 gene can be used as taxonomic marker for barcoding and identifying Tetrahymena species Some conducted on 75 strains of Tetrahymena by  Advantages  present in all eukaryotic cells and functions homoguosly in a wide range of them  more capable than 125 RNA and other mitochondrial genes  easily amplified when using universal PCR primers  less mutations because mitochondria reproduce via binary fission  useful in distinguishing between closely related species

Challenges:  The number of base pairs of the cox1 gene to amplify or obtain is still unknown

Application:  cox1 gene can be used to speed up discovery of new ciliate species and provide new insights  can be used by people who are not expert taxonomist to identify certain species

Group 5- Barcoding Eukaryotic Richness beyond the Animal, Plant and Fungal Kingdoms (review)

Purpose: discuss the advantages and limitations of DNA Barcoding

Challenges: multitude of genotypes that are hard to separate  18s rDNA is not effective enough to distinguish between inters the large majority of protists are currently uncultivable by known means or unavailable in culture  Useful Information  18s rDNA is found in all Eukaryotes  many copies/ highly expressed/ includes a combination of highly conserved and variable nucleotide sequences  2 step metabarcoding model  Step 1: preliminary identification using eukaryotic barcode  Step 2: group- specific barcode for ciliates Group 6- determine soil diversity (primary)

Purpose:  Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial COI gene in ciliates

Challenges:  COI gene can be used successfully in many animal taxa but not of all organisms  incomplete knowledge of ciliate diversity and dispute exists on the estimates of  Pertinent Research information  COI gene is used to better discriminate between closely related taxa and can be used as a barcoding

Group 7- primary

Purpose:  to test three different types of DNA separation methods  finding the method that is the most efficient

Challenges:  analyzing and interpreting the results  certain extraction methods compromise DNA quantity for DNA quality  different sites mean  different results  DNA isolation impaired by various factors

Application: Uniform method of extraction Low replication error extraction method

Group 8- Analyzing Articles on Metabarcoding (primary)  Purpose: how the affects the biodiversity of the protists present in varying soil samples  important to observe relationships with the environmental variables such as pH

Challenges:  there is not enough information or past studies on solid protestant diversity that it is hard to compare the data  application  QIIME software was used to eliminate sequences shorter than 150bp to eliminate faulty segments

Adair Presentation
purpose: using density and an isopycnic centrifugation to sort particles in a particular medium that uses the same density as those particles. A density gradient centrifugation is used to separate very small molecules  colloidal silica will be used with caution by wearing gloves  relatively fast protocol

Group Design Protocol

Separation of DNA using the Ludox density centrifugation

Use the PCRs to amplify the DNA

Use the 13SrDNA sequence of DNA

Analyze the results using the QIIME software that aids in cutting out short sequences
Conclusion:  Some of the articles that were presented were primary literature, while other, such as my group’s, were review articles. Both contained an abundance of information about the challenge that are encountered when using certain barcoding techniques and their specific purposes. Some of these techniques worked better in the area for distinguishing organisms that are relatively small, and some were effective in relatively large organisms. Our group designed a protocol that pulled from several techniques presented during the lab.

Future Steps 

After my group designed our own protocol, it is now time to take future steps. Although we did not put much thought into our process, hopefully our method or someone’s in the class will be efficient enough to replicated and perform during lab this semester. After reading and listen to all the articles, I am fully prepared to encounter many challenges when facing barcoding.

January 18

Lab 1: Introduction to Metabarcoding

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose

The purpose of this lab was to re-introduce ourselves with the lab tools and techniques we had learned last semester to observe ciliate cultures. We also began to examine literature protocol in order to familiarize and go more in depth with ciliate diversity.
Procedures: 

  • Review and be introduced to ciliates and their morphology and behaviors and the different types of species
  • Be introduced to the topic of metabarcoding
  • Take a 10 microliter drop of a ciliate sample
  • Observe the drop underneath a compound microscope
  • Record any observations you make
  • Begin looking at your groups assigned metabarcoding literature
  • Begin discussing with your group about the presentation

Results 

While observing the drop under the compound microscope, I only observed 5 ciliates moving around very quickly  I observed it at 40x magnification  The ciliates were very small and moved rapidly throughout the drop They moved around the entire drop and did not stay centralized

Article Information 

Review article

Mainly discussed challenges in metabarcoding

Article also evaluated means of taxonomic practice

The article analyzed large datasets

Conclusion

The purpose of this lab was to re-introduce us to the lab tools and techniques and to introduce us to the metabarcoding and literature protocol. I think this lab achieve its purpose and allowed us to realize the difficulties that comes with the newly discovered process of metabracoding. It has introduced us to the challenges others have faced in this area of study and the challenges we could possibly face in the lab ourselves.

November 30

Lab 13: Ciliate Isolation and Morphology Lab

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lab 13: Ciliate Isolation and Morphology Lab 13: Ciliate Isolation and Morphology
Purpose
The purpose of Lab 13 was to locate ciliates from the previously created ciliate cultures and capture them. Once they had been isolated from the culture, we were to take photos of them while examining them with a compound microscope. The second purpose of this lab was to learn about the morphology of different ciliates and understand the relationship between organisms.
Procedure

• Study the steps of mitosis and meiosis within a soil ciliate on the worksheet

◦ Provide an explanation for each step of the division

• Examine the ciliate culture wells with a light microscope

• Next, place a 5 microliter drop of the ciliate culture on a concavity slide using a micropipette

• Observe the ciliates using a compound microscope

• Switch the magnifications and take photos of the ciliates found

• Save the photos for future presentation use

• Fill out the worksheet for the various types of ciliates
Data and Observations
Initially very few ciliates were found under the microscopes and the ciliates almost seemed non-existent. One ciliate was found and captured and photographed.


Conclusion  While looking under the microscope, there were a few ciliates found at first, but the initial ones found were too small to be captured and examined. A great amount of difficulty came with the capturing of the ciliates. It was very exiting, however, when a ciliate was finally captured.

November 30

Lab 12: Soil Texture

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lab 12: Soil Texture Lab 12: Soil Texture
Purpose: The purpose of Lab 12 was to determine the compositions of the soil sample collected at the start of the semester. The second purpose of this lab was to continue practice in finding ciliates.
Procedure

• Obtain a test tube containing the soil sample you collected

◦ Make sure to not shake the tube and mix the particles

• Using a ruler, measure the height of the soil, silt, clay, and water in the test tube

◦ Do this by holding the ruler next to the tube and marking off the lines of separation in the soil

• Measure each distinct layer of composition in centimeters

• Record the height of each composition and the overall color of the soil

• Calculate the percentage composition of each component of the test tube

• Enter the soil data on the MetaData Sheet on Microsoft Excel

• Close the test tube and return the sample to the tube rack

• Obtain the flooded soil Petri dish and well tray from the previous lab

• Using a light microscope, observe the culture wells to see if any ciliates are present or if they replicated in the last week

• If they have replicated or if you are having a hard time finding ciliates move to a compound microscope

• Using the compound microscope, use a micropipette to put 10microliters of the culture on a concavity slide

• Observe the culture through the compound microscope

• Capture images of ciliates if found

• Clean up work station and return flooded soil Petri dish

Data and Observations
Soil color: dark brown

Sand: 10.20%

Silt: 40.10%

Clay: 2.90%

Water: 43.70%
During this lab, no ciliates were captured using the light or compound microscope.

Conclusion

At the completion of this lab, the class became more experienced with locating and capturing ciliates in a culture. After studying the soil sample, it was discovered that it was a silt soil sample. It was mostly composed of silt and sand and barely any clay. I had to wait a certain amount of time to observe my sample at first, because it was cloudy and had to settle again. Having not found any ciliates in this soil sample, I wonder if the amount of clay has an effect on any ciliates in a culture.

November 30

Lab 11: Ciliate and Soil Biodiviserity

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose:
The purpose of Lab 11 was to explore the diversity of soil ciliates and the soil itself. This was done through observing the soil samples collected at the beginning of the semester and re-flooding the soil so that ciliates would appear again. After flooding the Petri dish with water, the damp soil was observed for any soil ciliates. The second purpose of this lab was to determine the mass percent of water of the soil sample, the pH, and to set up a soil texture test tube.

Procedure:
• Obtain the mass of the dry soil from Lab 1
• Weigh the dry soil sample
• Calculate the mass percent of water using the formula: [wet soil-dry soil]/ wet soil x 100%
• Add 4mL of water to the test tube
• Add 4mL of soil to the test tube
• Place the test tube in the vortex and wait 3 minutes
• Wait and allow the soil to settle
• Extract 1mL of the liquid from the top of the test tube and put it into a micro-centrifuge tube.
• Place the micro-centrifuge tube into the vortex for about 1 minute
• Extract the clear liquid from the micro-centrifuge tube and place it into the mini glass tube.
• Place a piece of pH paper into the glass tube to measure the soil’s pH
• Record the pH
• Add 1 drop of the diapering agent in the original test tube of soil and water
• Shake the test tube to mix the components
• Label the test tube and place it back in the test tube rack
• Now remove any mulch, rocks, or sticks from the Petri dish of the original soil sample
• Once the large pieces have been removed, use water to flood the Petri dish until the soil is damp
• Do not make the Petri dish soaking wet
• Immediately observe the damp sample under a dissecting microscope to see if there is any ciliate movement already
• Put the Petri dish away and allow it to sit for 24 hours before checking again
• If ciliates are present after 24 hours, use a micropipette to catch the ciliates
• Place the caught ciliates on a concavity slide
• Use a compound microscope to observe the caught ciliates
• Place the ciliates into a 500 microliter solution of PPT using a micropipette and well tray
• Record any observations made
• Put the damp petri dish sample and well tray away once observations are made
Data and Observations

pH of soil= 6.5
After the immediate flooding of the plate, no ciliates were found in the soil.
24 hours later, no ciliates were found in the soil sample

Conclusion
It was exciting to finally use the soil we collected at the beginning of the semester. It was a little disappointing to not find any soil ciliates in my soil the first two tries, especially after waiting 24 hours. Hopefully, ciliates will be discovered in the next observation of my soil.

October 19

Lab 9: QTM

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Purpose:

The purpose of this lab was to become more familiar with Microsoft Excel and to begin to analyze the data

 

Procedure:

First, download the Excel class data spreadsheet from canvas

Next, select your group’s cell counts out of the table and form a separate table with just those values.

Select the data and click the Insert tab

Choose the bar graph under recommended graphs

Next, click on your graph once formed and click Chart Design

Find the Error bars, and select Standard Deviation bars from the drop down menu

Data and Observations:

DISCLAIMER: Upon discussion of data with other group members and Dr. Adair, it was decided our group would split and make two graphs and compare them separately.

 

 

Conclusion:

Although our groups had to create separate graphs we were able to compare our data. In both of our graphs, the control group was higher than the treatment culture.

October 19

Lab 8pt2: Data Analysis

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Lab 8: Data Analysis

Purpose: The purpose of today was to finalize the data and practice using excel and its data-organizing tools. We analyzed the data using t test and f test. After, we analyzed the data from our groups.

Procedure:

On excel:
Descriptive Statistics

Click data-data analysis-descriptive statistics
Select the initial count column for the input range
Select the location of your chart in output range
Unselect the summary statics
Repeat for experiment and control data

Histograms
Calculate your bin using intervals that will fit all of your data
Click data-data analysis- histograms
Highlight the data for input
Select the location of output
Repeat for control and treatment group

T test
Click data-data analysis-T-test
Compare the controls and treatment groups

Data

https://baylor0-my.sharepoint.com/personal/austin_scott1_baylor_edu/Documents/Ciliate%20Lab%208.xlsx?web=1

Conclusion: It can be concluded that there is a difference between the control and treatment groups, therefore the null hypothesis is rejected.