Thumbs and Colors

Do you ever think about this re: your teaching: what will my students remember about this class session a week from now? Let’s assume it’s lecture-discussion. Maybe they’re not even taking notes. What will they remember about an hour of their time this time next week?  I sometimes evaluate my experience at conferences in this way.

I spent the early part of last week at the Educause Learning Initiative conference in Austin <insert love letter to Austin> and listened to several enlightening conversations and systemically-minded thinkers. So now, a week later, what do I remember? The memory I’ve returned to each day since is actually a pseudo- memory–it’s one I crafted by merging pieces from two sessions1, which both had something to say about the difficulty of being a “novice learner.”

And as I think of it now, perhaps I remember pieces from both as one because each asked me to do something, and I’ll now ask of you the same.

 

Activity 1:

Clap your hands in front of you.

Now rub them together.

Now fold them and place them in your lap.

Which thumb is on top?2

Now interlace your fingers so that the other thumb is on top. How awkward does that feel?

 

 

Activity 2:

Using the image below, say aloud the color of the word, ignoring the color that the word spells.

This should be challenging or similarly uncomfortable (you’re experiencing cognitive overload).

I’ve done a mental merge on the memory of these two exercises because they are related categorically. Both mimic the difficulty of learning something for the first time–whether it’s something entirely foreign or learning to approach a subject in a new way. The act is awkward, uncomfortable, cognitively consuming, and only tacklable in short periods (for cognitive overload, apparently 10 minutes at a time).

While the immediate reference is something like, ‘This is what it feels like to be a student coming to the material you teach for the first time, even though you know it like floorplan of your home,’ there’s an additional way to think about this. That is, What is it like for an instructor (or anyone else for that matter) to change? Once you’ve got a general structure in place for the courses you teach, what is it be like to learn something new about “pedagogical effectiveness” <blah, blah, blah jargon> and attempt to delve into that, to implement it? <And if you want to get specific, the speaker from the first session talked about the discomfort of switching your default thumb position as the way that some people feel about technology + education.>

Tomorrow’s Ash Wednesday, the beginning of the Lenten Season. Religiosity aside, I’m willing to argue that the exercise of self-discipline in its varied, individualized forms offers a valuable growing experience: 40 days in which to cross your thumbs the other way and read the color, not the word. It’s an opportunity for attentiveness as much as change <or say that the other way around if it makes more sense to you>.

So for the next 40 days3  <this probably isn’t where you thought I was going>, I’m dissertating for Lent. <If I were a motivational speaker, this might have taken a different turn, but alas.> The uncomfortable part is that I’m chronicling the process here–which means being open about ideas as well as obstacles and forcing ugly, stilted sentences onto a page for the sake of the process. In theory, this will chart the forming of the articulatory loop–a thing that happens for PhDs as much as undergrads as much as toddlers.

To be gendered about the affair, sometimes it’s hard to go out in public without wearing makeup4, but it’s probably unhealthy to be cosmetically obsessive.5 Wish me luck or chastity. Whatever works.

 

  1. One on…? <see what I mean about the week thing?> and the other on learning and neuroscience <link not found>
  2. Here are some fun facts about your thumb placement c/o the speaker. If your right thumb is on top, you’re a “sexy person”; left thumb, “sneaky person.” Yes, these are evidently Science’s terms. If you place your thumbs next to each other–about 1 person in every 100 does–you’re a bit sexy, a bit sneaky. Cursory googling of the thumb test returned nothing novel, and any attempts at also including including “sexy” and “sneaky” only returned content that we’ll just call unrelated. So, best of luck determining the broader meaning of those descriptors, though please do share if you know.
  3. Save weekends and such since, 1, I have a kid, and 2, I make the rules.
  4. I know. But c’mon
  5. Erica Speegle, student and friend, this cite’s for you.

ELI Poster Session on Digital Storytelling

The EDUCAUSE Learning Inititative Annual Meetings took place this week (Feb. 13-15) in Austin. I presented a poster there based on the Gender Studies course I taught last semester in which I had the opportunity to pilot iPads for use with digital storytelling. Above and below are some shots of that poster (design c/o Addy Meira). I’m including the text of the poster here for those who’d requested it.

 

Title:

iPads in the Classroom: A Digital Storytelling Project

Summary:

Students (17) in an introductory course on gender studies were given iPads to for a semester to use for the production of digital stories.  After a trial period of two weeks to experiment with the tools, students worked in pairs or individually to create a series of digital stories. Students were instructed to create narratives based on self-determined salient concepts from course materials and readings. Storyboards and meetings with the instructor were required for each story created.

Digital Story/telling:

A short, first person video-narrative created by combining recorded voice, still and moving images, and music or other sounds. –- Center for Digital Storytelling

Or: Using digital tools in the creation of a narrative.

Course Objective:

Digital storytelling was intended to promote conceptual fluency.  Students were encouraged to use iPads to construct stories that would demonstrate deep knowledge and understanding. They created narratives ranging from personal stories related to course content, dramatizations of theoretical principles related to gender, and other illustrations exemplifying and/or applying course concepts.

Class Use:

The class was split into two groups. Members of each group produced digital stories on alternating weeks. Some students worked individually; others, in groups of two or three. The stories were shown in class and used to jumpstart discussion.

Tools:

–       iPad, iMovie, Storyrobe, 8mm HD

Student Reactions:

Students generally enjoyed the novelty of the project. Many expressed appreciation over being asked to demonstrate knowledge in personalized and artistic ways. On the other hand, a handful of students were disoriented and sometimes overwhelmed by working with unfamiliar tools and forms of expression. Although they were initially excited about working with iPads, students ultimately found them constraining and recommended use of digital storytelling for learning through web apps and other tools not limited to the iPad.

Considerations and Recommendations:

Meeting with students to discuss projects and storyboards was an integral part of the project. For this reason, I recommend use of digital storytelling in small classes. The project evolved substantially over the semester in light of student reactions, receptivity, and background knowledge of software and storymaking. For this reason, instructors planning to incorporate digital storytelling should be flexible and agile in their teaching.  Including a series of instructional seminars on the concept of digital storytelling and its implementation is necessary. iPads proved an optional rather than necessary tool for story creation—students reported that iPads sometimes hindered rather than facilitated the process.

ELI Poster 2
ELI Poster 1
Poster