Book Review: Deep Work by Cal Newport

By Greg Barnhill, Consultant

You need to read this book. Cal Newport, an academic and accomplished author, breaks down why we find “being productive” so difficult and, more importantly, what we can do about it.

In 287 well-researched pages, Newport explains both what is “Deep Work” and how to go about doing as much of it as humanly possible, while documenting the dangers and threats to this vision at every turn. If anything, Newport’s book is a perceptive meditation on the difficulty of doing one’s best work and how to overcome that difficulty. For graduate students—and Newport knows personally the unique struggles of academia—this book offers a vision for setting patterns and rituals that will lead to consistent contributions to one’s field.

What is “Deep Work” & Why Should We Care?

Newport defines “Deep Work” as “Professional activities performed in a state of distraction-free concentration that push your cognitive capabilities to their limit. These efforts create new value, improve your skill, and are hard to replicate” (3). The goal is “to wring every last drop of value out of your current intellectual capacity” (3). In Part One he explores why deep work is worthwhile: it is economically valuable and advantageous, leading to economic security; the alternative, shallow work, does not lead to economic security; and deep work is more fulfilling, not only economically but on a personal level. Readers might quibble with defining value so often in economic terms in Chapters One and Two (although as graduate students your end goal is to get a job!), but through personal anecdotes and a philosophical argument for depth, Newport does show that “to build your working life around the experience of flow produced by deep work is a proven path to deep satisfaction” (86).

“Less mental clutter means more mental resources available for deep thinking.”

I must admit that I had two reservations before reading this book, and Newport has proven me wrong about both. First, I expected the book’s argument to be built upon personal stories that motivated me to dig deep within myself and simply work harder. I did not want to hear another message like that. Instead, Newport offers an incredibly well-researched perspective—a major strength of the book. When he makes a surprising claim, such as “embrace boredom,” he quickly shifts to studies and other relevant data to support his proposals and rarely resorts to opinion.

Second, I expected to find elements of a moral treatise that takes a stance against the world of distraction and its effects upon our ability to work productively. Newport, however, has no interest in the debate about whether tech is the future or our downfall as a society. For him, the commitment to deep work “is instead a pragmatic recognition that the ability to concentrate is a skill that gets valuable things done” (258). Part Two of the book—called “The Rules”—follows this pragmatic approach and outlines in four chapters how to enact the vision of deep work.

Grad School Takeaways

Since Newport is an academic (an assistant professor of computer science), much of what he envisions applies naturally to the academic context. Here are some takeaways that might prove immediately applicable to the context of being a graduate student and particularly to the task of writing.

Attention Residue Effect: Interruptions and obligations lead to “attention residue” when one is working on a large project such as writing a paper. Newport recommends minimizing this attention residue and maximizing performance on one task at a time. By planning high-intensity, focused, and distraction-free work (i.e., deep work), one can avoid the negative effect of task-switching.

Take Control of Your Time: You only have so much willpower, so set a schedule for yourself that ritualizes deep work. Where will you work and for how long? And how will you support your work? (Think: coffee, snacks, etc.) Making these decisions ahead of time allows one to focus on the deep work itself.

Daily Shutdown: Newport recommends deciding when you will stop working and sticking to it. Studies show that one cannot perform deep work for more than four or so hours a day, and that downtime improves the performance of the bursts of high-intensity deep work that should characterize our days. So, make a ritual that helps you to shut down your work for the day. Paradoxically, not working can make your deep work more productive.

Quit Social Media: Newport really does say that! But he doesn’t mean what you think he means. Leaving aside the research that he cites about the negative effects of social media on intellectual capabilities, Newport intends for his readers to reflect on whether social media leads them to their career goals. In his view, such an exercise will show one how to free up time and mental resources for deep work; “Less mental clutter means more mental resources available for deep thinking” (252). Think about your time and commitments in terms of tools—what will most effectively help you accomplish your goals? Newport’s advice is radical: drop everything except the most essential!

Newport’s book offers much more, but most importantly it fundamentally reframes the question about work and time. Everyone has the same amount of time. Newport argues that your best work will come when you tend to the quality of your work and the focus with which you go about doing it.

Utilizing Baylor’s Graduate Writing Center Resources

By Becca Cassady, Consultant/Coordinator

Ask almost any graduate student—almost anyone in higher ed, really—and we’ve been there: So deep in a dissertation chapter that we can’t write our way out.  Stumped by cryptic “revise and resubmit” feedback. Unable to please a grant committee comprised of academics outside of our discipline.  Intimidated by a blank Word document at the beginning of a project. Even when we’re pretty pleased with a document, sometimes we still hesitate to hit “send.”

Writing can be hard. Especially if you feel like you’re in it alone.

Enter the Graduate Writing Center (GWC). The GWC is a Graduate School service designed to aid graduate students with their various writing projects—from class assignments to dissertation chapters to job application materials.   We help brainstorm, reorganize complex arguments, reword ambiguous or unclear sentences, and more. All of our consultants are advanced stage doctoral students with extensive writing training and experience.  We offer writing groups that you can opt into each semester, occasional workshops, and one-on-one consultations.

I’ve had students ask me, “Isn’t this mainly for people in humanities?” Absolutely not!  Our consultants are from humanities, social sciences, and STEM fields; as the coordinator, I do my best to pair students with a consultant within their discipline or a closely related one.

When they’re not experts in your subject matter, consultants act as “expert outsiders”: experts in writing who can offer a fresh perspective, ensuring that you’re communicating clearly to an outside audience.* They are trained in what questions to ask and what concerns to look for.

Our Approaches to Consultations

When we meet with you one-on-one, we aim to create meaningful writing experiences by using a variety of best practices.  I’ve listed a few of our priorities below.  (And just so you don’t have to take my word for it, I’ve included real student evaluations from our feedback surveys.)

We dedicate ample time to written and verbal feedback. We know that graduate level writing is complex and often long. (Those dissertation chapters are no joke!) Our consultants spend one to two hours with your project before your appointment to compile thoughtful written comments. This makes your one-hour in person (or online) meetings far more focused and productive.

“[The consultant] had gone over my document before we met and had great ideas for rearranging the structure of it. But she also listened to my concerns about it as we were meeting and adjusted feedback on the spot.” (May 2019)

We listen. Our goal is to help you say what you need and want to say.

“[The consultant] addressed my concerns very specifically, and our discussion in which I bounced around different ideas was very helpful. She was a good sounding board.” (December 2018)

“I appreciated how unbiased the consultant was; even though he personally disagreed with my argument, was still helpful and thoughtful. As someone who is terrible at objectivity, I appreciated that.” (December 2018)

“[The consultant] had great and helpful feedback! She was willing to listen to what I needed and tailor her comments to my concerns (i.e., project organization or sentence level issues depending on the stage of the project.)” (December 2018)

We help students develop long-term writing strategies while working with assignments.  Much of our time is aimed at improving individual assignments sent our way: we discuss argument, content, sentence flow, wording, and more.  However, we also use those as opportunities to teach clients strategies and tools to help them in future writing projects.

“[My consultant] is amazing! She takes the time to teach me writing skills…[S]he doesn’t just help me correct mistakes. I have learned so much from her this year.” (May 2019)

We see our student colleagues first and foremost as people, not assignments. Sometimes what you need in graduate school is encouragement. Our consultants speak not only from a place of expertise but also from a place of understanding.  We have been and currently are experiencing the demands of academia right alongside you. You can be sure we’re rooting for you.

“Encouraging and constructive feedback that was sufficiently detailed without feeling overwhelming.” (December 2018)

In using these approaches, it’s my hope that you walk away with a stronger paper and clarity about recommended revisions and future projects.

Debunking Writing Center Myths

Finally, I want to correct two common misconceptions about the Graduate Writing Center:

  1. “GWC consultants are proofreaders.” We are consultants, not proofreaders. We believe our most helpful resource is our consultants’ position as writing experts or “expert outsiders.”  We want your time with the consultant to be spent talking through what we call “higher order concerns” – things like argument, structure, flow, and clarity—rather than punctuation or formatting. That doesn’t mean we don’t deal with sentence level issues; we are happy to point out errors as we provide feedback. However, we will never merely correct a paper for you.  Our goal is to equip you to proofread your own papers, identify errors, and correct them on your own. Almost anyone can double-check the use of italics or commas for you, but we value our consultants’ writing and content expertise and hope you will, too!
  1. “GWC consultants will perfect my paper.” We can’t guarantee perfection. (Wouldn’t that be grand if we could?!) From applications to class assignments, there are many factors that go into a project’s evaluation that are beyond our control. However, our consultants aim to get to know the project’s audience and context before providing feedback to help you craft a document that is clearer, more readable, better organized, etc.

I hope you’ll give us the opportunity to work with you on your upcoming projects.  Send me an email at gwc@baylor.edu with your document and main concerns, and you’ll have taken your first step towards what I hope will be an encouraging and helpful consultation!

*Adler-Kassner, Linda and Elizabeth Wardle, eds. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing. UP of Colorado, 2016.