May 6

5-3-19 — Climate Change Deliberation

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  1. Did any of the Options appeal to you more than the others?

The options that appealed to me the most were the ones focusing on awareness and innovation, such as the options we spoke about pertaining to increasing the efficiency of the “dirtier” fuel sources we currently have so that society has more time to come around to clean fuel sources naturally while also giving those energies time to be improved as well. I also think it’s important to spread the severity of this issue and talk about the little things that they can do to be part of the solution and not get harmed by some effects of climate change.

2. Did you hear or think of any new way of addressing the issues associated with the              warming of the climate?

We read a lot of ways that co2 emissions could be limited but a lot of them involved taxing or limiting freedoms of people and overall we decided that these were not going to be first choices.

3. What are your thoughts on the use of Public Deliberation in the classroom or the                community? Is this something you would like to facilitate?

I think that deliberation instead of argument is a lot more effective at getting to the problem and how to solve it without emotions getting people riled up. It makes it so that everybody is on the same side instead of competing and I think that our time was very productive.


Posted May 6, 2019 by Brandon Reider in category Brandon Reider

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*