Rationale:

To continue working on our previous question and developing alternatives.

Procedures:

1. We continued to research the background behind our plaque morphology question and ascertain its feasibility.
2. . After determining its infeasibility we began looking at other questions, settling on a question about Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Transporters and how that gene appeared in NapoleonB.
3. We created a basic plan for ascertaining how to proceed with the NMT question.

Conclusions/Next Steps:

After consulting with Lathan we determined our plaque morphology question was infeasible to pursue for our IRP, we then settled on a question about the appearance of NMT in NapoleonB. The next step will be to continue working on this question and researching it as it is our IRP question, we will also practice the presentation of our poster for NapoleonB.