December 1

Redoing of Nanodrop Results and Redoing PCR (11/30/18)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Rationale:

Gel electrophoresis was rescheduled for Monday. PCR will be done with the correct concentration of exacted DNA. Since the flash drive carrying the results from the Nanodrop was misplaced, it was decided to redo the Nanodrop readings. Also, more gels were made.

Nanodrop Results:

The results differed greatly from the previous ones. Instead of having a DNA concentration of 888.1 ng/µL, the following values were found.

Nanodrop Results from 11/30

Trial Nucleic Acid (ng/µL) A260/A280 A260/A230 A260 A280 Baseline Absorbance
1 1164.323 1.976 1.77 23.286 11.787 0.647
2 1077.553 1.993 1.725 21.551 10.811 -0.274
3 1121.914 1.979 1.751 22.438 11.338 0.836

 

Three trials were performed to confirm that the DNA concentration was much higher than previously recorded. All three trials had the same nucleic acid factor of 50 and the baseline correction of 340 nm. The final trial readings were recorded as Ferranti’s corrected Nanodrop results and were used in PCR calculations.

Procedure:

  1. Combined and vortexed 1 µL of exacted DNA (Ferranti) with 9 µL of sterile water to create a Ferranti 10-1
  2. Combined and vortexed 1 µL of Ferranti 10-1dilution with 9 µL of sterile water to create a Ferranti 10-2
  3. Once an aseptic zone was established, 12.5 µL of 1X MM, 2.2 µL of Ferranti 10-2dilution, and 6.5 µL of ddH2O were combined three times into three different microcentrifuge tubes.
  4. 4 µL of primer 1, primer 2, and primer 3 were placed into their correlating microcentrifuge tubes.
  5. Placed microcentrifuge tubes in thermo-cycler and activated program STU.
  6. 40 mL of 1X TAE and 0.8 g of powdered agarose were combined and swirled together in an Erlenmeyer flask.
  7. Heated the Erlenmeyer flask until the mixture was boiling then mixed solution until the bubbles disappeared. Repeated until the solution was consistent.
  8. Allowed the solution to cool until it was cool enough to touch.
  9. Added 2.0 µL of EtBr to the flask to achieve a concentration of 0.5 µg/µL.
  10. Poured mixture into gel apparatus and placed comb.
  11. Once the gel solidified, the comb was removed, and TAE buffer was poured over the gel to keep it from drying out.

Observations:

  • The thermocycler used the program STU which started with 5 minutes of initial denaturation at 98.0ºC. Then, 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 98.0ºC followed by 30 seconds at 55.0ºC followed by 45 seconds at 72.0ºC occurred. After the cycles, a final extension happened at 72.0ºC for 5 minutes.
  • A positive control was also made to confirm that the PCR mixture was not contaminated. Anita’s, a phage with a high titer of 2.0109pfu/mL, DNA was used.

PCR Calculations:

where

C1is the extracted DNA concentration (1,121.91 ng/µL)

V1is the volume needed to add into PCR mixture (needs to be ~ 2 µL)

C2is the DNA concentration wanted (25 ng/µL)

V2is the dilution factor

  • Steps 6-11 were repeated 4 times to create a total of 4 2% agarose gels.

Next Steps:

Gel electrophoresis will be run with the microcentrifuge tubes prepared from Wednesday (11/28) and the microcentrifuge tubes prepared today so both diluted and non-diluted samples can be compared to each other. Also, these results will identify Ferranti’s cluster.


Posted December 1, 2018 by Kathryn Adkins in category Kathryn Adkins

About the Author

Kathryn Adkins is currently a freshman attending Baylor University majoring in neuroscience with a minor in biochemistry.  She hopes to one day earn an M.D./Ph.D. and become a pediatric oncologist and cancer researcher. Kathryn volunteers at Cook Children’s Hospital in Fort Worth and is actively involved in AMSA (American Medical Student Association) and BURST (Baylor University Research in Science and Technology).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*