September 29

9/26 ~ Repeat of purification plaque assay

Rationale:

Repeating the last plaque assay due to contaminated arthrobacter. Will be performing another purifcation plaque assay from the previous 10^0 lysate from 9/24 (Kept in refrigerator)

Procedure:

  • Created an aseptic zone to prevent the possibility of bacterial contamination
  • Retrieved 10^0 lysate from refrigeration and created a 10^-1 and 10^-2 dilution
    • Created by adding 90μL PB into microcentrifuge vial and adding 10μL of the previous dilution
  • Added the dilutions of lysate into separate 400μL vials of arthrobacter into infect
  • Obtained a 50mL vial and added in 16.8 mL LB Broth, 180μL 1M CaCl2, and 20 mL 2XTA (Enough for 9 plates)
  • Immediately pipetted 4.5 mL TA mixture into the arthrobacter vial(s), shook to mix, and plated
  • Let sit for 15 minutes and then incubated

Observations:

  • The control TA plate sat for less than 15 minutes
  • Surprising that the arthrobacter was the one to be contaminated, rather than the LB Broth or TA
  • Lathan explained that the bacteria in our sample most likely are not arthrobacteria anymore since there were no plaques, and rather were another strain of bacteria

10^0 plate with contamination. Interesting pattern created

10^-1 contaminated plaque assay

10^-2 exhibiting contamination

The control TA with contamination

Conclusion/Next Steps:

It was unfortunate that there as contamination since after this plaque assay, the lysate would’ve been able to be used to create a titer and web a plate. It has shifted lab time one session back. The next steps would be to analyze the results from this plaque assay and hopefully be able to create/calculate a titer and web a plate

September 29

9/24 ~ Further Purification

Rationale:

Performed another plaque assay on the lysate to further purify the bacteriophage

Procedure:

  • Created an aseptic zone to minimize chances of bacterial contamination
  • Picked a plaque from the 9/21 plaque assay (10^0 dilution) and pipetted into 100μL of PB
  • Created a 10^-1 dilution by adding 10μL of lysate (10^0) to 90μL of PB
  • Created a 10^-2 dilution by adding 10μL of lysate (10^-1) to 9 μL of PB
  • Obtained a 50 mL conical vial and added in 18mL LB Broth and 202.5μL CaCl2 in (Calculated for 9 plates)
  • Added 10μL of lysate (All three) to separate 0.5μL arthrobacter vials (Allow to infect)
  • Added in 22.5 mL 2XTA to the conical vial, and immediately pipetted 4.5 mL of the TA into the bacteriophage+arthrobacter vial and plated (For all three)
  • Let the plates sit for 15 minutes and then incubated

Observations:

Not as many plaques on the 10^-1, but still a considerable amount

Significant amount of plaque on the 10^0

10^-2 plaque assay with only a few plaques

The group TA control was contaminated yet again, possibly indicating something is contaminated in either the LB Broth or TA

Conclusion/Next Steps:

The lab group was able to finish this procedure without problems or using up too much time since we are repeating procedures. Next lab period, will be looking for countable plaques on the 10^0 plate to create a webbed plate

September 28

9/26/18 Re-Plating of 3rd Purification Plaque Assays – Soil B

Previous Results:

  •  The plaque assays and control plate (9/24) were all found to be contaminated. After examining other plates, it was concluded that the stocks of LB broth and 2x Top Agar used during the last plating were contaminated. The previous procedure and plaque assays would have to be redone.

Objective:

  • Pick a plaque from the plaque assay made during last lab
  • Conduct a third series of serial dilutions and plate the diluted lysates with phage

Procedure:

  1. Aseptic Zone was prepared. Lab space was cleaned using CiDeon and wiped dry with paper towel. Ethanol (70%) was then sprayed, wiped, and evaporated. Ethanol burner was then lit on the table.
  2. A plaque was picked from the 10^0 plate by placing the tip of the pipet into a clearing on the plate. The tip was then put in 100 microL phage buffer and pipetted up and down 15 times to release phage in buffer, becoming a new 10^0 dilution
  3. 10 microL of new 10^0 was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube containing 90 microL of PB, creating 10^-1 dilution
  4. Step 3 was repeated to create a 10^-2 dilution
  5. The 3 dilutions were poured into separate tubes of 0.5 mL Arthrobacter to allow phage to interact with bacteria
  6. A mixture of Overlay Agar for 4 plates was made using 8 mL of LB broth, 90 microL CaCl2, 10 mL 2xTA. Then the mixture was separated into 4 50 mL tubes, with 4.5 mL in each.
  7. The mixture of Arthrobacter and dilutions were poured in their respective tubes, 10^0, 10^-1, and 10^-2
  8. All experimental tubes and the control tube were plated and left to harden for 15 min
  9. Plates were placed in incubator for 48 hours.

Results:

  • Results will not be available until next lab (10/1)) to see if the phage were plated correctly and there are positive results.

Conclusion:

  • The results from the previous lab were inconclusive
  • The serial dilution was correctly conducted using a picked plaque from the positive plate

Next Steps:

  • During the next lab (10/1)) the plates with the third round of serial dilutions will be examined for phage. If positive, then the experiment will move on to the next steps of calculating a high titer to create a webbed plate.
September 28

9/24/18 3rd Purification Plaque Assays – Soil B

Previous Results:

  • Plaque assays from second purification that were created during the last lab (9/19) were all positive and the control did not have any contamination.

Objective:

  • Pick a plaque from the plaque assay made during last lab
  • Conduct a third series of serial dilutions and plate the diluted lysates with phage

Procedure:

  1. Aseptic Zone was prepared. Lab space was cleaned using CiDeon and wiped dry with paper towel. Ethanol (70%) was then sprayed, wiped, and evaporated. Ethanol burner was then lit on the table.
  2. A plaque was picked from the 10^0 plate by placing the tip of the pipet into a clearing on the plate. The tip was then put in 100 microL phage buffer and pipetted up and down 15 times to release phage in buffer, becoming a new 10^0 dilution
  3. 10 microL of new 10^0 was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube containing 90 microL of PB, creating 10^-1 dilution
  4. Step 3 was repeated to create a 10^-2 dilution
  5. The 3 dilutions were poured into separate tubes of 0.5 mL Arthrobacter to allow phage to interact with bacteria
  6. A mixture of Overlay Agar for 4 plates was made using 8 mL of LB broth, 90 microL CaCl2, 10 mL 2xTA. Then the mixture was separated into 4 50 mL tubes, with 4.5 mL in each.
  7. The mixture of Arthrobacter and dilutions were poured in their respective tubes, 10^0, 10^-1, and 10^-2
  8. All experimental tubes and the control tube were plated and left to harden for 15 min
  9. Plates were placed in incubator for 48 hours.

Results:

  • Results will not be available until next lab (9/26) to see if the phage were plated correctly and there are positive results.

Conclusion:

  • The results from the previous lab were positive
  • The serial dilution was correctly conducted using a picked plaque from the positive plate

Next Steps:

  • During the next lab (9/26) the plates with the third round of serial dilutions will be examined for phage. If positive, then the experiment will move on to the next steps of calculating a high titer to create a webbed plate.
September 28

9-26-18 — Second Attempt of Purification: Second Passage Soil Sample B

Date: Wednesday, September 26th, 2018

Title: Second Attempt of Purification: Second Passage Soil Sample B

Rationale: The purpose of today’s lab is to repeat the procedure from the last lab day and passage the phage for a second time.

Class Question: Is there a difference in bacteriophage presence or type in soil samples taken from live oaks vs those from red oaks?

Situation: It was determined by experimentation that what had been used during the last lab day was not arthrobacter ATCC 21022. This was determined by trying to infect a bacterial lawn with a high titer bacteriophage. The results were negative, meaning the bacteria was not arthro. Because of this, every procedure from Monday involving arthrobacter has to be repeated. Below is an image of my second passage plaque assay with no plaques (the small dot was determined to be the location of a bubble and therefore not a plaque).

Procedure:

  1. An aseptic zone was set up.
  2. Plaque assays from the first purification passage were taken back out and a second plaque was chosen to be picked.
  3. 100 microliters of phage buffer were transferred to a microcentrifuge tube.
  4. A pipette tip was touched into the chosen plaque and swirled in the microcentrifuge tube to add phage to solution.
  5. The microcentrifuge tube was vortexed to mix phage with buffer. This was set aside for later use.
  6. Agar for four plates was made using the following recipe in a 50 mL conical vial:
    1. 8.4 mL LB broth (Note: more LB broth was used due to a decrease in available arthrobacter)
    2. 10 mL 2x Top Agar
    3. 90.0 microliters 1M CaCl2
  7. The LB broth and 1M CaCl2 were added to the 50 mL conical.
  8. 10 microliters of the phage buffer and phage solution in the microcentrifuge tube was transferred to a culture tube containing 400 microliters arthrobacter.
  9. The culture tube was set aside for 15 minutes to allow the phage to infect the arthro.
  10. 10 mL 2x top agar was added to the 50 mL conical and pipetted to mix the solution.
  11. 4.5 mL of the top agar solution was added to a top agar control plate.
  12. 4.5 mL was added to the culture tube containing the arthro and phage sample.
  13. This solution was added to an agar plate and moved around to cover the plate with solution.
  14. The plates were left sitting to allow the agar to harden.
  15. The plates were inverted and left to incubate.

Observations: The plaque assay from last lab day wasn’t usable since the bacteria in the top agar wasn’t arthrobacter. By keeping our old plaque assays, there were more plaques available to pick without having to totally repeat the whole purification process from the first passage.

Results: This experiment yielded a new plaque assay that can be evaluated and either passaged again or begin to web a plate.

Next Step: The next step is to either further passage the phage, try to web a plate and prepare for amplification, or begin the purification process again with either another plaque on my first plaque assay or with new soil.

September 28

SEPTEMBER 21ST, 24TH, 26TH- Labs

  • SEPTEMBER 21ST, 2018
    • SOIL FILTRATION
    • OBJECTIVE: 
      • Filter out new soil sample 
    • PROCEDURE: 
      • Tables were cleaned and lamps were lit 
      • 4 mL of soil was put into a test tube and filled to the 24mL mark with LB broth 
      • Tube was then shaken for 15 minutes 
      • Then a separate tube was filled with water to be its “mass buddy” and it was centrifuged for 7 minutes 
      • Next a weigh boat was massed and wet soil was added and massed 
        • The weigh boat its the soil was then left to dry in the fume hood
      • A falcon tube was then filled with 10 ml of soil and was then filled to the 20 ml with DI water
        • Then 3 drops of dispersion liquid was added to the tube, it was then shaken for 30 seconds and then left to sit over night
      • Then the tube that was then spun was retrieved and then had the supernatant filtered using a top filter 
      • 10mL of the supernatant was left in the test tube and 5mL was put into a different test tube 
      • The test tube containing the 10mL had .4mL of Arthro added to it (enriched sample)
      • Was then left to incubate 
      • The 5mL test tube was then put in the fridge (direct sample)
    • RESULTS: 
      • Soil Meta Data 
        • Sand 65%
        • Silt 15%
        • Clay 20%
    • Water percent
        • Mass of plate: 7.57g 
        • Mass of wet soil: 13.01g
        • Mass of dry soil: 12.23g
        • Mass of water: .78g
        • 6% water
    • CONCLUSION:
      • Metadata was collected, will now conduct plaque assay next to test for phage presence 
    • NEXT STEP: 
      • Conduct a plaque assay 
  • SEPTEMEBER 24TH, 2018 
    • PLATING PLAQUE ASSAY 
    • OBJECTIVE: 
      • Conduct a plaque assay with NO CONTAMINATION
    • PROCEDURE:
      • Tables were cleaned and lamps were lit
      • Direct and enriched samples were filtered out using a syringe and a .22 𝝁m filter 
      • Next, a large test tube was filled with:
        • 10 mL of LB
        • 12.5 mL of 2XTA 
        • 112.5 CaCl 
      • .10 𝝁L of lysate was then added to the containing .5mL of Arthro and was left for 15 minutes 
      • The tube contains the 2X TA solution was then placed in a hot water bath so it would not solidify 
      • Next 5mL of the TA solution was added to a plate, where 10 𝝁L of the direct were added to it 
      • The plate was swirled then was left to solidify
      • Another 5mL was pipetted onto a different plate to serve as control 
      • Next the tubes contain the lysate and Arthro had 5mL of the TA solution added to it
        • Solution was mixed then was poured onto plates 
      • Plates were left to solidify and were then inverted and placed into incubator 
    • RESULTS:
      • The results as seen in figure 13 were contaminated due to the Arthro sample being a different bacteria 
    • CONCLUION: 
      • The results seen have been deemed inconclusive due to laboratory issue with Arthro 
    • NEXT STEPS: 
      • Conduct another plaque assay 
  • SEPTEMBER 26TH, 2018
    • PLATING ANOTHER PLAQUE ASSAY (SAME SAMPLE)
    • OBJECTIVE:
      • To conduct another plaque assay without contamination 
    • PROCEDURE:
      • Test tubes containing .4mL of Arturo had 10 𝝁L of lysate added to it, and was left to sit for 10 minutes
      • A large test tube was filled with 
        • 10mL of 2X TA 
        • 90 𝝁L of CaCl
        • 8.4 mL LB broth 
      • 5mL of the TA solution was poured onto a plate and served as the control 
      • Then 5mL of TA solution was put into the tubes contains the Arturo and lysate
        • The contents of the tubes were mixed then poured onto plates 
        • The plates then solidified for 10 minutes and were then inverted and placed in the incubator 
    • RESULTS: 
      • Waiting to view plates and obtain results
    • CONCLUSION:
      • Waiting on results 
    • NEXT STEPS: 
      • View results and determine if phage are present, if so dilutions will be carried out, and if not a new soil sample will be collected 
September 28

9-24-18 — Purification: Second Passage Soil Sample B

Date: Monday, September 24th, 2018

Title: Purification: Second Passage Soil Sample B

Rationale: The purpose of today’s lab is to further passage the bacteriophage in order to purify the phage sample.

Class Question: Is there a difference in bacteriophage presence or type in soil samples taken from live oaks vs those from red oaks?

Procedure:

  1. An aseptic zone was set up.
  2. Plaque assays were evaluated and plaques were marked on the plate.
  3. 100 microliters of phage buffer were transferred to a microcentrifuge tube.
  4. A pipette tip was touched into a plaque and swirled in the microcentrifuge tube to add phage to solution.
  5. The microcentrifuge tube was vortexed to mix phage with buffer. This was set aside for later use.
  6. Agar for four plates was made using the following recipe in a 50 mL conical vial:
    1. 8 mL LB broth
    2. 10 mL 2x Top Agar
    3. 90.0 microliters 1M CaCl2
  7. The LB broth and 1M CaCl2 were added to the 50 mL conical.
  8. 10 microliters of the phage buffer and phage solution in the microcentrifuge tube was transferred to a culture tube containing .5 mL arthrobacter.
  9. The culture tube was set aside for 15 minutes to allow the phage to infect the arthro.
  10. 10 mL 2x top agar was added to the 50 mL conical and pipetted to mix the solution.
  11. 4.5 mL of the top agar solution was added to a top agar control plate.
  12. 4.5 mL was added to the culture tube containing the arthro and phage sample.
  13. This solution was added to an agar plate and moved around to cover the plate with solution.
  14. The plates were left sitting to allow the agar to harden.
  15. The plates were inverted and left to incubate.

Observations: This plate yielded a significantly smaller number of plaques. This is probably due the purification leaving out other phage species as the plaque assays and dilutions isolate the phage more and more.

Results: This lab yielded a plaque assay that can be further evaluated in order to perform a third passage on the phage sample.

Next Steps: The next step is to evaluate the plaque assay during the next lab. If the results are positive, the next step is to passage the phage for a third, possibly final, time. If the results are negative, then the next step is to either pick a different plaque from the first passage or to start with new soil (soil sample C).

September 28

Spot Test 9/26/2018

Rationale: the arthro from the last class was probably contaminated because the positive controls did not yield any plaques. The results from the previous spot test are inconclusive so the experiment had to be repeated

Invalid spot test results from previous class

Process:

  1. Set up aseptic system
  2. Made LB agar media for 1 control plate and 1 sample plate
    1. We only had 400 µL of arthro available so 5 samples were spotted on the sample plate
    2. Reagents Control Sample
      LB Broth 2.1 mL 4.2 mL
      2x TA 2.5 mL 5 mL
      CaCl2 23 µL 45 µL
      arthro NA 400 µL
  3. poured 5 mL of LB agar media into each plate and let sit ~5 min
  4. pipetted 5 µL of direct (RSM), direct (LCG), enriched (RSM), enriched (LCG), and phage buffer (negative control) into designated areas of sample plate and let sit ~10 min
  5. incubated for 48 hours

 

Next steps: If the spot test is positive, perform a plaque assay to check for plaques again. If the spot test, is negative, dig more dirt!

September 28

Spot Test 9/24/2018

Rationale: Perform spot test with new direct and enriched isolations to check for the presence of phages

Process:

  1. set up aseptic system
  2. made LB agar broth for sample plates and a control plate
    1. Reagents Control Sample
      LB Broth 2 mL 4 mL
      2x TA 2.5 mL 5 mL
      CaCl2 23 µL 45 µL
      arthro NA 1 mL
  3. poured 5 mL of LB agar broth into each plate and let sit for ~10 min
  4. used syringe filter to filter enriched sample
  5. pipetted 5 µL of direct isolation, enriched isolation, and phage buffer (negative control) into designated areas of sample plate and let sit for ~10 min
  6. put plates in incubator for 48 hours

soil metadata:

  1. % H2O:
    1. mass of water = 0.49 g
    2. mass of wet soil = 6.01 g
    3. 0.49 g / 6.01 g * 100% = 8.15% H2O
  2. sand/silt/clay
    1. total volume = 2.75 mL appr.
    2. sand = 1 mL appr.
    3. silt = 1 mL appr.
    4. clay = 0.75 mL apprx.

1 / 2.75 * 100% = 36.4% sand

1 / 2.75 * 100% = 36.4% silt

0.75 / 2.75 * 100% = 27.2% sand

soil metadata: sand, silt, and clay layers

 

Next steps: If the spot test is positive, perform a plaques assay with enriched isolation to check for plaques again. If the spot test is negative, look for a new soil sample outside.

September 28

Soil C Plaque Assay 2

9/26/18

Rational:

A new plaque assay will be performed as the last plaque assay was not done with arthrobacter and some other bacteria instead. So a new plaque assay will be performed in order to check for the presence of arthrobacter phage.

Procedure:

  • Cleaned lab desk with CiDecon and ethanol
  • Set up and aseptic zone
  • Put 10 ML FS lysate into 400 ML arthro
  • Put 2 mL LB broth into TA mixture
  • Added 22.5 ML 1M CaCl2 to the TA mixture
  • Added another .1  mL LB broth to the TA mixture
  • Added 400 ML arthro and lysate to the TA mixture
  • Added 2.5 mL TA
  • Poured on plate and waited 10 minutes
  • Put 2.1 mL LB broth to control TA mixture
  • Added 22.5 ML 1M CaCl2 to control
  • Added 2.5 mL TA to the control
  • Poured on the plate and waited 10 minutes
  • Put plates in incubator at 26 C at 3:30
  • Cleaned lab desk with CiDecon and ethanol

Conclusion:

The plates from 9/24 were not able to comfirm the presence or absence of arthrobacter phage in soil C. This is because the bacteria that was used was not the arthrobacter that has been used, so any plaques seen would be from the presence of of a different type of phage. Contamination was also seen on both the control and plaque assay plates this in itself would have required that I new plaque assay be done. Next lab I will check for plaque on plaque assay soil C 2. If there is plaque then I will start purification and if there is not then I will collect a new soil sample and filter it and collect metadata. If there is contamination I will do another plaque assay.

                                       

Fig.7.C – This image shows the plaque assay for soil C                   Fig.8.C – This image shows the control plate for soil    (done with an unknown bacteria not arthrobacter). The               C which also has an unknown bacteria growing on it.  white spots show contamination.                                                        This plate is covered in white spots indicating                                                                                                                                  contamination (may be difficult to see).

                                                          

Fig.9.C – This shows the control plate for plaque                            Fig.10.C – This image shows the plate for soil C        assay soil C 2. The yellow circles in indicate where                         plaque assay 2. The yellow circle shows where a          bubbles are located to prevent them from being                             bubble is to prevent it from being mistaken as a          mistaken for plaque.                                                                              plaque.